Since I came back to Houston, it became readily apparent how extensive the damage a drought and high temperatures can be. While I've been fond of the sky-scapes and the trees and what greenery is around, I'd have to be far blinder than I am to miss the sere fields of grass, the blanched roots, and trees that had this not been summer, would have looked quite at home in a fall setting.
The first time I recall seeing drought
conditions was in southern California around 1977. Rolling terrain
was either tan or gray for as far as the eye could see. I forget how
long California's drought lasted, but it was long and extensive and had repercussions beyond California's borders. Texas
has been in drought since Christmas, I believe, and there doesn't
seem to be any long-range prediction that it will come to an end
soon. It may not be the worst drought on record, but that doesn't mean
it's inconsequential. I'd go so far to say that although certain
areas are in better shape now than in previous droughts, at issue is
that there the population is considerably larger and there are
greater demands being made on infrastructure.
Of course, people will say that
hurricane season's coming and this should alleviate drought
conditions along the Gulf Coast; however, that does nothing for the
rest of the state nor by extension, for other states similarly
afflicted. Moreover, there's no guarantee that high winds and rain
from hurricanes might not do more harm than good nor that drought
conditions will resume in force in the post-hurricane season.
One thing that becomes readily apparent
in strolling around Houston is the aridity of the soil. It's not just
that the prolonged exposure to the sun has burnt lawn and field; it's
the cracking of the soil underneath and the lack of ability to move
mineral to plant that water provides, as well as rejuvenating the
soil with a regular rain cycle. Additionally, at this point, high
winds and heavy rain might be just as likely (in not more likely) to
contribute to washing away topsoil and contributing more to erosion
than to the gradual soaking into the earth healthy soil requires.
This may seem idiotic to post, but in
case anyone has never considered the consequences of drought
(deforestation, desertification and almost uninhabitable terrain)
from a naturalist's perspective, it might be worthwhile to consider
those consequences from an economic and societal perspective. That said, I'm
going to skirt energy usage and the health hazards for a bit and focus on the immediate environmental
consequences.
The most obvious change for the
suburbanite is the degradation of one's lawn and water rationing.
Right now, people are still using watering at will (although I've
seen several signs posted about the required times to water the
lawn.) At this level, this is probably more of an inconvenience than
a hardship. However, when water bills increase and fines are levied,
this will be a different matter.
On a wider level and with much broader
consequences, is what this means to ranchers
and farmers.
Not merely a matter of irrigation, the other issues are soil
depletion and disruption of life-cycles in the various ecosystems any
given ranch or farm might find itself. It's a no-brainer that if you
can't get water to crops, there's going to be issues, but that's only
part of the problem; if plants aren't able to survive in the
surrounding area, insects and bugs that sustain the ecosystem and the
pollination and soil fertilization necessary to keep the ground
healthy vanish. This adds an additional burden to the farmer to find
alternative provision for soil health. For the rancher, this means
grazing land is depleted and livestock going hungry. In turn, this
brings on a disruption in birth-rates. Livestock isn't going to be
reproducing at the same rate, thus additional economic burdens on the
rancher, as well.
Thus, produce and livestock prices will
increase from supplier to market to consumer. If any state relief is
found, this could be added to the tax structures, too. In as much as
food supply shouldn't have an impact on fuel prices, impacts will be
felt in other sectors beside grocery retail; consider restaurants,
institutional supply and any animal or produce to be exported outside
the region. If you think this is so much fustian, ask yourself what
the principle ingredients for beer are; barley, hops, water. In
drought conditions, all three are likely to be increasingly scarce,
thus the down-market cost to the consumer will go up accordingly.
Indeed, given how many ingredients are derivative from animal
by-product or vegetable components, expect to see non-food-related
commodities also rise in price.
I weary of the reaction from people who
say “oh, well, that's too bad” and move on without realizing that
what transpires in one part of the country will eventually effect
them in theirs. I've seen this play out several times in my life
since the late seventies. It could be as small as price hikes in
grapes, the result of labor disputes in California or you might see
it in four-dollar-a-gallon for gas in reaction to issues between
petroleum companies and OPEC or you might just see it in your taxes
because interstate highways are in disrepair. The difference is that
these issues can be handled since they're created by humans. Taxes
suck, higher gas prices blow and no one wants produce to go up;
however, prices based on these issues can be adjusted and stabilized
both by market forces, mediation and legislation. A drought brings
devastation for which no market adjustment can be readily made
(except that consumers will wind up buying goods from other places
than those produced in the regions afflicted.)
These were some of the thoughts that
came to me as I took another pass through Memorial Park and Allen
Parkway. The trees are still mostly green, but thousands have died in Memorial Park alone and as you can see from the pictures, the
ground isn't green.
Aside from radical irrigation systems
and aggressive fertilization, I don't know what else can be done to
stave off the reduction of the Rio Grande and Red Rivers to mere
trickles or what to do for the farmers and ranchers across the state
and the region (this drought is bigger than Texas). It will be
interesting to see how populations respond to this. Typically, people
leave when goods get too costly and when the environment grows too
uncomfortable to inhabit. If the record temperatures return as the
drought moves on, electricity usage will continue to rise and this,
too, will have noticeable consequences for the consumer.
In the end, though, this isn't just
about consumer economics. The implications for the country are
larger. What do we do with population transfer when regions become
less viable to grow on? What changes take place in societies when
conditions grow harsher, particularly in larger geo-social areas like
the United States (or Brazil or India or China)? We have some serious
problems facing mankind as a whole on the horizon in this
twenty-first century. The drought in Texas is one in a series of
those; it's an indicator of what to expect since nature doesn't
recognize boundaries or political parties.
As dire as this sounds, there's also
the counterbalance that things are not always as bleak in present or
potential terms, as they seem (or as some would like them,
perversely, to be). My sense is that as dystopic as some scenarios
can be (and we all love a good dystopia), things never quite play out
as dramatically as we see in movies or books. China has survived multiple famines and ecologic
disasters. While the U.S. doesn't cover the same amount of land mass,
our population is considerably smaller and I'm inclined to believe
that we have both intellectual and economic resources at hand that
could aid in developing solutions to internal problems.
The larger issue is how much of an
impact does any given environmental problem have on our neighbors
and/or our relations beyond the geographic range of the North
American continent. It hasn't happened yet; but if we look at recent
environmental catastrophes in Asia (the most recent being the
combined earthquake/tsunami in Japan), we should develop a heightened
awareness of potential issues and have in place a variety of
solutions to any such given catastrophe.
Additional resources and references:
http://are.berkeley.edu/courses/EEP101/Detail%20Notes%20PDF/Cha18,%20Economics%20of%20Drought.pdf
http://www.treesforhouston.org/assets/files/Severe%20Drought%20Killing%20Houston-Fox%2026%20News.pdf
http://www.treesforhouston.org/assets/files/Severe%20Drought%20Killing%20Houston-Fox%2026%20News.pdf
Following are three sets of
before/after photos from earlyAugust compared to today, September 6. The earlier photos are on the left. Note that the earlier photos were taken on a cloudy day and that set 3, while shot from the same general area is taken from a considerably different vantage point. To view full-size, click on the image.
Set 1:
Set 2:
Set 3:
Rather than load up this entry with sixty some-odd photos, I've compiled them into a slideshow. These images are from Memorial Park as well as Allen Parkway and again, it might be that the trees for the most part look green; but a) not all of them are and b) it's the sere ground that's the most tell-tale proof of a lack of water.
No comments:
Post a Comment